FAS vs. PINT, OAP3, HFEL, HEFT, AUSC, NAIT, JEMI, ANII, MTW, and TAM
Should you be buying Fidelity Asian Values stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fidelity Asian Values include Pantheon Infrastructure (PINT), Octopus Apollo VCT (OAP3), Henderson Far East Income (HFEL), Henderson European Focus Trust (HEFT), abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth (AUSC), North American Income Trust (NAIT), JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts (JEMI), abrdn New India Investment Trust (ANII), Mattioli Woods (MTW), and Tatton Asset Management (TAM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Pantheon Infrastructure (LON:PINT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, community ranking, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.
Pantheon Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity Asian Values.
Pantheon Infrastructure has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fidelity Asian Values' net margin of -97.04%. Pantheon Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.13% beat Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity.
Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pantheon Infrastructure has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Pantheon Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out -18,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
In the previous week, Fidelity Asian Values' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pantheon Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.
54.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Pantheon Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Pantheon Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Fidelity Asian Values received 113 more outperform votes than Pantheon Infrastructure when rated by MarketBeat users.
Summary
Fidelity Asian Values beats Pantheon Infrastructure on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Fidelity Asian Values News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Fidelity Asian Values Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
