PINT vs. FAS, AUSC, HFEL, HEFT, NAIT, JEMI, ANII, OAP3, MTW, and TAM
Should you be buying Pantheon Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Pantheon Infrastructure include Fidelity Asian Values (FAS), abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth (AUSC), Henderson Far East Income (HFEL), Henderson European Focus Trust (HEFT), North American Income Trust (NAIT), JPMorgan Global Emerg Mkts (JEMI), abrdn New India Investment Trust (ANII), Octopus Apollo VCT (OAP3), Mattioli Woods (MTW), and Tatton Asset Management (TAM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Fidelity Asian Values (LON:FAS) and Pantheon Infrastructure (LON:PINT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, community ranking, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.
Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pantheon Infrastructure has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Fidelity Asian Values received 113 more outperform votes than Pantheon Infrastructure when rated by MarketBeat users.
Pantheon Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity Asian Values.
In the previous week, Pantheon Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Asian Values'average media sentiment score.
Pantheon Infrastructure has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Pantheon Infrastructure's net margin of -97.04%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 10.13% beat Pantheon Infrastructure's return on equity.
Fidelity Asian Values pays an annual dividend of GBX 15 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Pantheon Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Fidelity Asian Values pays out -18,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
54.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Pantheon Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Pantheon Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
Fidelity Asian Values beats Pantheon Infrastructure on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Pantheon Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PINT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Pantheon Infrastructure Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
