AKA vs. WISH, LGCB, LVLU, DIBS, SFIX, QRTEA, DDL, MYTE, JMIA, and HEPS
Should you be buying a.k.a. Brands stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of a.k.a. Brands include ContextLogic (WISH), Linkage Global (LGCB), Lulu's Fashion Lounge (LVLU), 1stdibs.Com (DIBS), Stitch Fix (SFIX), Qurate Retail (QRTEA), Dingdong (Cayman) (DDL), MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (MYTE), Jumia Technologies (JMIA), and D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. (HEPS). These companies are all part of the "catalog & mail - order houses" industry.
a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and ContextLogic (NASDAQ:WISH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, community ranking, dividends and analyst recommendations.
a.k.a. Brands has higher revenue and earnings than ContextLogic. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ContextLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, ContextLogic had 4 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ContextLogic and 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. ContextLogic's average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that ContextLogic is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
ContextLogic received 15 more outperform votes than a.k.a. Brands when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 47.89% of users gave ContextLogic an outperform vote while only 31.67% of users gave a.k.a. Brands an outperform vote.
a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus target price of $11.75, suggesting a potential downside of 37.33%. ContextLogic has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.36%. Given ContextLogic's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ContextLogic is more favorable than a.k.a. Brands.
55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of ContextLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 17.1% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of ContextLogic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -18.10% compared to ContextLogic's net margin of -113.62%. a.k.a. Brands' return on equity of -15.31% beat ContextLogic's return on equity.
a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ContextLogic has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
a.k.a. Brands and ContextLogic tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get a.k.a. Brands News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AKA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
a.k.a. Brands Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
