LMB vs. BBCP, MTRX, AGX, NOA, CINT, GLDD, WLDN, LYTS, SWIM, and MEC
Should you be buying Limbach stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Limbach include Concrete Pumping (BBCP), Matrix Service (MTRX), Argan (AGX), North American Construction Group (NOA), CI&T (CINT), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD), Willdan Group (WLDN), LSI Industries (LYTS), Latham Group (SWIM), and Mayville Engineering (MEC).
Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Concrete Pumping (NASDAQ:BBCP) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, community ranking, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.
Limbach currently has a consensus price target of $39.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.19%. Concrete Pumping has a consensus price target of $8.50, indicating a potential upside of 22.83%. Given Concrete Pumping's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Concrete Pumping is more favorable than Limbach.
Limbach received 92 more outperform votes than Concrete Pumping when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 57.08% of users gave Concrete Pumping an outperform vote while only 55.76% of users gave Limbach an outperform vote.
Concrete Pumping has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Limbach. Concrete Pumping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Limbach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Limbach has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Concrete Pumping has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Concrete Pumping has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Limbach's net margin of 4.02%. Limbach's return on equity of 18.87% beat Concrete Pumping's return on equity.
55.8% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.2% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Limbach shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.4% of Concrete Pumping shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, Limbach had 6 more articles in the media than Concrete Pumping. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Limbach and 0 mentions for Concrete Pumping. Limbach's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Concrete Pumping's score of 0.00 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Limbach beats Concrete Pumping on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Limbach News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LMB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
