PCFT vs. CHRY, CORD, IPO, FSFL, GROW, FSG, NAS, CGI, JEGI, and LIO
Should you be buying Polar Capital Global Financials stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Polar Capital Global Financials include Chrysalis Investments (CHRY), Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (CORD), IP Group (IPO), Foresight Solar (FSFL), Molten Ventures (GROW), Foresight Group (FSG), North Atlantic Smaller Cos (NAS), Canadian General Investments (CGI), JPMorgan European Growth & Income (JEGI), and Liontrust Asset Management (LIO). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Polar Capital Global Financials (LON:PCFT) and Chrysalis Investments (LON:CHRY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, community ranking, dividends, valuation and earnings.
In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Global Financials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Global Financials. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Polar Capital Global Financials' score of 0.00 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Polar Capital Global Financials received 105 more outperform votes than Chrysalis Investments when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Chrysalis Investments an outperform vote while only 78.26% of users gave Polar Capital Global Financials an outperform vote.
Chrysalis Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Polar Capital Global Financials. Polar Capital Global Financials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chrysalis Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 0.00% beat Polar Capital Global Financials' return on equity.
82.6% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Polar Capital Global Financials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Summary
Chrysalis Investments beats Polar Capital Global Financials on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Polar Capital Global Financials News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PCFT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PCFT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Polar Capital Global Financials Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
