FCSS vs. CGT, LWDB, BRWM, EDIN, AGT, IEM, N91, JMG, VEIL, and ATT
Should you be buying Fidelity China Special stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fidelity China Special include Capital Gearing (CGT), Law Debenture (LWDB), BlackRock World Mining Trust (BRWM), Edinburgh Investment (EDIN), AVI Global Trust (AGT), Impax Environmental Markets (IEM), Ninety One Group (N91), JPMorgan Emerging Markets (JMG), Vietnam Enterprise (VEIL), and Allianz Technology Trust (ATT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Fidelity China Special (LON:FCSS) and Capital Gearing (LON:CGT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and community ranking.
Capital Gearing received 4 more outperform votes than Fidelity China Special when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 77.56% of users gave Capital Gearing an outperform vote while only 66.86% of users gave Fidelity China Special an outperform vote.
Fidelity China Special pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Capital Gearing pays an annual dividend of GBX 60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Fidelity China Special pays out 12,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Gearing pays out -2,898.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
Fidelity China Special's return on equity of 0.00% beat Capital Gearing's return on equity.
Fidelity China Special has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Gearing. Capital Gearing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity China Special, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
63.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.8% of Fidelity China Special shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Capital Gearing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, Fidelity China Special had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Gearing. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fidelity China Special and 1 mentions for Capital Gearing. Fidelity China Special's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Capital Gearing's score of 0.32 indicating that Fidelity China Special is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Fidelity China Special beats Capital Gearing on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Fidelity China Special News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FCSS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FCSS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Fidelity China Special Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
