FAR vs. CTL, ARS, ZNWD, ARCM, PXC, GSP, KP2, PYX, MKA, and 1SN
Should you be buying Ferro-Alloy Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Ferro-Alloy Resources include CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Asiamet Resources (ARS), Zinnwald Lithium (ZNWD), Arc Minerals (ARCM), Phoenix Copper (PXC), Gensource Potash (GSP), Kore Potash (KP2), PYX Resources (PYX), Mkango Resources (MKA), and First Tin (1SN). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.
CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, community ranking and valuation.
CleanTech Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CleanTech Lithium's net margin of -91.86%. CleanTech Lithium's return on equity of -40.98% beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity.
CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.99, meaning that its share price is 199% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.
13.4% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
CleanTech Lithium presently has a consensus price target of GBX 295, indicating a potential upside of 1,056.86%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Ferro-Alloy Resources.
Ferro-Alloy Resources has higher revenue and earnings than CleanTech Lithium. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CleanTech Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
CleanTech Lithium received 3 more outperform votes than Ferro-Alloy Resources when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 100.00% of users gave CleanTech Lithium an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Ferro-Alloy Resources an outperform vote.
In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Ferro-Alloy Resources beats CleanTech Lithium on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Ferro-Alloy Resources News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
