HWO vs. SHLE, SDY, PSD, CWC, E, AVE, MCB, ESN, MXX, and SFD
Should you be buying High Arctic Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of High Arctic Energy Services include Source Energy Services (SHLE), Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) (SDY), Pulse Seismic (PSD), CWC Energy Services (CWC), Enterprise Group (E), Aveda Transportation and Energy Services (AVE), McCoy Global (MCB), Essential Energy Services (ESN), MATRRIX Energy Technologies (MXX), and NXT Energy Solutions (SFD). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.
High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and Source Energy Services (TSE:SHLE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, community ranking and analyst recommendations.
High Arctic Energy Services received 34 more outperform votes than Source Energy Services when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 63.95% of users gave Source Energy Services an outperform vote while only 61.41% of users gave High Arctic Energy Services an outperform vote.
In the previous week, High Arctic Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Source Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for High Arctic Energy Services and 2 mentions for Source Energy Services. High Arctic Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Source Energy Services' score of 0.18 indicating that High Arctic Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Source Energy Services has a consensus price target of C$16.75, indicating a potential upside of 61.68%. Given Source Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Source Energy Services is more favorable than High Arctic Energy Services.
Source Energy Services has a net margin of 28.03% compared to High Arctic Energy Services' net margin of -12.66%. Source Energy Services' return on equity of 171.52% beat High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity.
Source Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than High Arctic Energy Services. High Arctic Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Source Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.1% of Source Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 50.7% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Source Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
High Arctic Energy Services has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Source Energy Services has a beta of 2.91, indicating that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Source Energy Services beats High Arctic Energy Services on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get High Arctic Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HWO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartThis chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
High Arctic Energy Services Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools