ADN vs. EOSE, TWIN, DM, TPIC, IPAX, SSTI, TAYD, NNBR, EML, and QUAD
Should you be buying Advent Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Advent Technologies include Eos Energy Enterprises (EOSE), Twin Disc (TWIN), Desktop Metal (DM), TPI Composites (TPIC), Inflection Point Acquisition (IPAX), SoundThinking (SSTI), Taylor Devices (TAYD), NN (NNBR), Eastern (EML), and Quad/Graphics (QUAD). These companies are all part of the "industrial products" sector.
Eos Energy Enterprises (NASDAQ:EOSE) and Advent Technologies (NASDAQ:ADN) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation and community ranking.
In the previous week, Eos Energy Enterprises had 13 more articles in the media than Advent Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Eos Energy Enterprises and 2 mentions for Advent Technologies. Eos Energy Enterprises' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Advent Technologies' score of 0.49 indicating that Advent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Eos Energy Enterprises received 18 more outperform votes than Advent Technologies when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 48.89% of users gave Eos Energy Enterprises an outperform vote while only 28.57% of users gave Advent Technologies an outperform vote.
Eos Energy Enterprises has a beta of 2.29, suggesting that its share price is 129% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Advent Technologies has a beta of 0.17, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Eos Energy Enterprises presently has a consensus target price of $4.83, indicating a potential upside of 576.18%. Given Advent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Eos Energy Enterprises is more favorable than Advent Technologies.
54.9% of Eos Energy Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.5% of Advent Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Eos Energy Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.6% of Advent Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Advent Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Eos Energy Enterprises. Eos Energy Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advent Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Eos Energy Enterprises has a net margin of -1,446.65% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises' net margin of -1,756.87%. Advent Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat Eos Energy Enterprises' return on equity.
Summary
Eos Energy Enterprises beats Advent Technologies on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Advent Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ADN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ADN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Advent Technologies Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
