BLDE vs. CLMB, LGCL, ARQ, PRTH, SHAP, MTC, LSAK, SEZL, IBEX, and PAYS
Should you be buying Blade Air Mobility stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Blade Air Mobility include Climb Global Solutions (CLMB), Lucas GC (LGCL), ARQ (ARQ), Priority Technology (PRTH), Spree Acquisition Corp. 1 (SHAP), MMTec (MTC), Lesaka Technologies (LSAK), Sezzle (SEZL), IBEX (IBEX), and Paysign (PAYS). These companies are all part of the "business services" sector.
Blade Air Mobility (NASDAQ:BLDE) and Climb Global Solutions (NASDAQ:CLMB) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, community ranking and valuation.
Blade Air Mobility currently has a consensus price target of $9.33, indicating a potential upside of 153.62%. Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $68.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Blade Air Mobility's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Blade Air Mobility is more favorable than Climb Global Solutions.
Climb Global Solutions has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Blade Air Mobility's net margin of -21.66%. Climb Global Solutions' return on equity of 18.93% beat Blade Air Mobility's return on equity.
Blade Air Mobility has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Blade Air Mobility received 10 more outperform votes than Climb Global Solutions when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 80.00% of users gave Climb Global Solutions an outperform vote while only 60.87% of users gave Blade Air Mobility an outperform vote.
47.4% of Blade Air Mobility shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.7% of Climb Global Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Blade Air Mobility shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of Climb Global Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Climb Global Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Blade Air Mobility. Blade Air Mobility is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Climb Global Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Blade Air Mobility and Blade Air Mobility both had 11 articles in the media. Climb Global Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Blade Air Mobility's score of 0.60 indicating that Climb Global Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
Climb Global Solutions beats Blade Air Mobility on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Blade Air Mobility News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BLDE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BLDE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Blade Air Mobility Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
