HTG vs. AT, GMS, EGY, TLW, DEC, PTAL, SQZ, SAVE, TGA, and SEPL
Should you be buying Hunting stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Hunting include Ashtead Technology (AT), Gulf Marine Services (GMS), VAALCO Energy (EGY), Tullow Oil (TLW), Diversified Energy (DEC), PetroTal (PTAL), Serica Energy (SQZ), Savannah Energy (SAVE), Thungela Resources (TGA), and Seplat Energy (SEPL). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.
Ashtead Technology (LON:AT) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, community ranking, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.
Ashtead Technology pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Ashtead Technology pays out 476.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hunting pays out 1,454.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
Ashtead Technology currently has a consensus target price of GBX 775, indicating a potential downside of 3.00%. Hunting has a consensus target price of GBX 407, indicating a potential upside of 10.15%. Given Ashtead Technology's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Ashtead Technology.
Hunting received 433 more outperform votes than Ashtead Technology when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Ashtead Technology an outperform vote while only 59.65% of users gave Hunting an outperform vote.
Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Ashtead Technology. Hunting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashtead Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Ashtead Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Hunting. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ashtead Technology and 1 mentions for Hunting. Ashtead Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Hunting's score of 0.22 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
86.3% of Ashtead Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Ashtead Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Hunting shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Ashtead Technology has a net margin of 18.85% compared to Ashtead Technology's net margin of 12.60%. Hunting's return on equity of 22.43% beat Ashtead Technology's return on equity.
Ashtead Technology has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Hunting beats Ashtead Technology on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Hunting News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HTG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HTG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
