Cambridge Nutritional Sciences (CNSL) Competitors

GBX 3.87
+0.02 (+0.60%)
(As of 01:53 PM ET)

CNSL vs. PRM, BVX, IMM, KNB, POLX, LLAI, SNG, FDBK, IHC, and INHC

Should you be buying Cambridge Nutritional Sciences stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences include Proteome Sciences (PRM), BiVictriX Therapeutics (BVX), ImmuPharma (IMM), Kanabo Group (KNB), Polarean Imaging (POLX), LungLife AI (LLAI), Synairgen (SNG), Feedback (FDBK), Inspiration Healthcare Group (IHC), and Induction Healthcare Group (INHC). These companies are all part of the "medical" sector.

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences vs.

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences (LON:CNSL) and Proteome Sciences (LON:PRM) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, community ranking, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences has a beta of 3.87, suggesting that its stock price is 287% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Proteome Sciences has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 102% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Proteome Sciences had 1 more articles in the media than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Proteome Sciences and 0 mentions for Cambridge Nutritional Sciences. Proteome Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cambridge Nutritional Sciences' score of 0.00 indicating that Proteome Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences Neutral
Proteome Sciences Neutral

Proteome Sciences received 162 more outperform votes than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences when rated by MarketBeat users.

CompanyUnderperformOutperform
Cambridge Nutritional SciencesN/AN/A
Proteome SciencesOutperform Votes
162
57.04%
Underperform Votes
122
42.96%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
N/A
Proteome Sciences
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
N/A

Proteome Sciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences. Proteome Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cambridge Nutritional Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences£9.05M1.02-£3.03M-£0.01-387.00
Proteome Sciences£5.03M2.35-£2.44M-£0.01-400.00

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences has a net margin of -27.32% compared to Proteome Sciences' net margin of -48.59%. Proteome Sciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat Cambridge Nutritional Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cambridge Nutritional Sciences-27.32% -28.71% -9.19%
Proteome Sciences -48.59%N/A -8.48%

1.7% of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.2% of Cambridge Nutritional Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.5% of Proteome Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Proteome Sciences beats Cambridge Nutritional Sciences on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cambridge Nutritional Sciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CNSL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CNSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CNSL vs. The Competition

MetricCambridge Nutritional SciencesMedical Instruments & Supplies IndustryMedical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£9.21M£2.49B£4.84B£1.43B
Dividend YieldN/A1.90%38.74%11.87%
P/E Ratio-387.00322.44112.851,668.61
Price / Sales1.02179.492,358.05350,604.16
Price / CashN/A107.4831.9832.57
Price / Book0.973.704.922.70
Net Income-£3.03M£85.07M£100.53M£174.90M
7 Day Performance-0.46%0.97%114.95%1.21%
1 Month Performance15.35%-2.03%118.76%2.51%
1 Year PerformanceN/A1.23%129.87%9.30%

Cambridge Nutritional Sciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PRM
Proteome Sciences
0 of 5 stars
GBX 3.20
flat
N/A-27.3%£9.45M£5.03M-320.0029Gap Up
BVX
BiVictriX Therapeutics
0 of 5 stars
GBX 12
+4.3%
N/A-23.3%£9.90MN/A-300.0017Gap Down
IMM
ImmuPharma
0 of 5 stars
GBX 2.13
+6.3%
N/A-16.7%£8.85M£94,819.00-212.5013Gap Down
KNB
Kanabo Group
0 of 5 stars
GBX 1.70
-1.7%
N/A-40.2%£10.75M£1,000.00-170.0023
POLX
Polarean Imaging
0 of 5 stars
GBX 3.74
-0.5%
N/A-85.2%£8.09M£1.03M-74.8428Gap Down
LLAI
LungLife AI
0 of 5 stars
GBX 25.20
-4.9%
N/A-51.9%£7.73M£98,566.00-140.0015Gap Down
SNG
Synairgen
0 of 5 stars
GBX 5.56
-10.3%
N/A-32.1%£11.20M£79,000.00-111.2634News Coverage
FDBK
Feedback
0 of 5 stars
GBX 85
+3.0%
N/A-36.0%£11.33M£1.02M-326.9224Gap Up
IHC
Inspiration Healthcare Group
0 of 5 stars
GBX 16.67
+0.2%
N/A-64.2%£11.37M£41.08M-1,666.50210
INHC
Induction Healthcare Group
0 of 5 stars
GBX 12.50
flat
N/A-47.9%£11.55M£11.82M-83.3383Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

This page (LON:CNSL) was last updated on 5/13/2024 by MarketBeat.com Staff

From Our Partners