CMPG vs. ROOF, OSEC, HOT, GOT, SHRS, HAN, ANIC, UTL, MIX, and MHN
Should you be buying CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth include Atrato Onsite Energy (ROOF), Octopus AIM VCT 2 (OSEC), Henderson Opportunities (HOT), Global Opportunities Trust (GOT), Shires Income (SHRS), Hansa Investment (HAN), Agronomics (ANIC), UIL (UTL), Mobeus Income & Growth VCT (MIX), and Menhaden Resource Efficiency (MHN). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth (LON:CMPG) and Atrato Onsite Energy (LON:ROOF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, community ranking, valuation, earnings and risk.
Atrato Onsite Energy has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atrato Onsite Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
0.6% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Atrato Onsite Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Atrato Onsite Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Atrato Onsite Energy has a net margin of 71.54% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's net margin of 0.00%. Atrato Onsite Energy's return on equity of 4.64% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's return on equity.
Atrato Onsite Energy has a consensus price target of GBX 100, indicating a potential upside of 50.60%. Given Atrato Onsite Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Atrato Onsite Energy is more favorable than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth.
In the previous week, Atrato Onsite Energy had 2 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Atrato Onsite Energy and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth. Atrato Onsite Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth's score of 0.00 indicating that Atrato Onsite Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Atrato Onsite Energy received 2 more outperform votes than CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth when rated by MarketBeat users.
Summary
Atrato Onsite Energy beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
CT Global Managed Portfolio Growth Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
